Last week, Shepherds Circle gathered a group of pastors whose churches average fewer than 100 in worship attendance. Originally, we called this group “small church pastors.” But during last week’s conversation, it became clear that “small church” may not be the best way to describe this group.
According to the latest data from Nazarene research, the breakdown of worship attendance across Nazarene churches in the USA/Canada is the following:
| Worship Attendance | Churches | % |
| Zero | 383 | 8.1% |
| 1–49 | 2,289 | 48.4% |
| 50–99 | 1,172 | 24.8% |
| 100–249 | 640 | 13.5% |
| 250–749 | 210 | 4.4% |
| 750+ | 33 | 0.7% |
| Total | 4,727 | 100.0% |
Of the 4,727 Nazarene churches in the USA/Canada, 3,844 have fewer than 100 people in worship attendance. That represents 81% of all churches. Moreover, 57% have fewer than 50 people in attendance.
“Small” may technically describe these churches, but maybe it is not the most helpful term. “Average,” “normal,” “majority church,” or simply “the majority” might be a more accurate descriptor. In fact, “the vast majority” may be the best narrative of the group representing more than 80% of our churches. Which raises an important question: If the vast majority of our churches have fewer than 100 people in worship, shouldn’t our strategies for moving forward reflect the realities, strengths, and challenges of the vast majority?
The vast majority of churches don’t necessarily need to know how the 0.7% of churches with 750+ in attendance operate. That is a different ball game. The vast majority need strategies for the realities they face every day: navigating difficult parishioner dynamics (like the pastor who last week described a member threatening to leave over the church’s lighting); addressing deferred maintenance in aging facilities with limited resources; and discovering creative revenue streams to help fund the mission.
Does what’s reported on the Annual Pastor’s Report (APR) show the health of a vast majority of the Nazarene churches? Maybe not. Does an improvement in worship attendance from 75 to 80—or a five-person decline—really tell us much about the faithfulness of a congregation? What matters is what that body of believers is doing in its community. Are they loving people beyond the walls of the church? Are they praying? Do they have a broken heart for those who are far from Jesus? How many members are engaged in mission and service? Are they supporting their pastor? Are they forming disciples who are learning to live holy lives in a post-Christian America?
These questions may tell us far more about the health of a church than an attendance number. That leads to an even larger question: If the metrics we often use to measure success or failure—the numbers reported on the APR—do not fully reflect what is happening in the vast majority of our churches, do we need to consider new metrics?
Maybe success should not be defined simply by how many people fill a pew, but how many people serve after they leave their seats. Success should not be determined by how much money is placed in an offering plate, but how much love is offered to a neighbor. Perhaps we should be asking not only how many people attended last Sunday, but how many people were discipled, served, prayed for, welcomed, encouraged, or introduced to Jesus during the week.
Those kinds of kingdom activities are much harder to capture in a report filled with numbers. The APR gives statisticians a picture of certain realities, but it does not capture all the ways the kingdom of God is advancing through a local congregation.
The vast majority of our churches are doing the work of the kingdom. Much of that work simply isn’t recorded on the APR. Let’s find better ways to articulate, recognize, and celebrate what is happening.
Facts:
1. The vast majority of our churches are faithfully serving Jesus in their local contexts.
2. The vast majority of our pastors are faithfully leading, loving, praying, serving, and persevering. Their churches may not be large, but their faithfulness is significant.
Conclusion:
1. Maybe it’s time to stop calling them “small churches” and start recognizing them for what they really are: the vast majority of the Church of the Nazarene.
2. And maybe it’s time to celebrate them—not because they have achieved impressive numbers, but because they are faithfully doing the work God has called them to do.
.











