Should the Church of the Nazarene Postpone the 2021 General Assembly?

Who has thought, “I’m glad the Nazarene General Assembly wasn’t in 2020″? Probably most globally connected Nazarenes watching the cancelations of every large group gathering in 2020. But will 2021 be better? Of course, no one knows the future. I’m fairly certain there are no crystal balls at the Global Ministry Center. But it seems the question should be asked (as it is being asked by the IOC concerning cancelling the already postponed 2020 Olympics in Tokyo) should we cancel or postpone the 30th General Assembly in 2021?

I’m not a prophet or the son of a prophet (to steal a line from Amos), but it’s sensible to presume that by June of 2021, in Indianapolis the worst Covid-19 troubles of 2020 will have passed. But will the virus be completely contained worldwide by June of 2021? What if there is a second wave in the United States in January or February of 2021? What if there is not a vaccine? What if there is a vaccine but it has not been delivered globally to the 160+/- countries that the Church of the Nazarene operates in? Will the U.S. government allow entry into the country from those countries that have had no access to a vaccine? Obtaining a visa into the US was not easy in 2017 before the pandemic (just ask those delegates from the Philippines or Guatemala who did not have their visas approved in 2017). It is reasonable to assume that it will be even harder for international delegates to obtain visas in a post-pandemic, but still weary United States in 2021.

Postponing the General Assembly for a year might not be the worst decision. In the last several General Assemblies resolutions have been proposed to move General Assemblies to a five year cycle. At the 2017 General Assembly, if I remember correctly, all of the General Superintendents (and a few formers GSs) were in support of moving General Assembly to every five years. I believe their endorsement was based on the increasing cost of holding a General Assembly (the actual cost of a General Assembly is held tighter to the vest than nuclear launch codes, but I think it’s a lot). I voted against the resolution because of two big reasons: 1) The world changes so quickly. Waiting five years is too long to address our changing culture and subsequent changing challenges; and 2) General Assembly is like a family reunion. If we are serious about being an internationally connected church, the four-year gathering is essential to those relationships. I think it’s too late to change my vote, but in light of the pandemic I wish I had voted differently.

The question should be reasonably asked can we have a family reunion if half the family is denied entry into the United States? Can we afford a General Assembly in a year when the World Evangelism Fund (WEF) will probably decline because of the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic? It may be time to ask if the 30th General Assembly should take place in 2022.

5 thoughts on “Should the Church of the Nazarene Postpone the 2021 General Assembly?

  1. Shionel Blas Gesite

    Am sure the GB Executive Committee is already discussing this very valid point and issue! All arguments in your Blog are very valid, including the effect on WEF by this Pandemic!

    Reply
  2. Terry patnode

    General assembly could be the tool of self extinction of the church of the Nazarene. Think about it!

    Reply
  3. Sherry Everidge

    Thank you for this discussion! I was actually wondering if GA might take place completely digitally this time after seeing the huge difference in attendance at the last one, now that so many overseas are watching online. It was a bittersweet moment. I miss seeing us all together but am thankful more folks can be a part from afar. Along this line, can we possibly find a less expensive venue for the smaller crowd and spend less money on the giant signage I saw in the lobby and worship center? It really isn’t necessary. I would love to see everyone every two years, if we could all afford it, but very very soon we’ll all be together and won’t have to save for it, or pack for it, or have meetings, or ever have to say, “Goodbye.” Praise His Name!!! Love you all – forever.

    Reply
  4. Steve Burns

    I don’t know what a “tool of self-extinction” would look like but I don’t think General Assembly is that. We have talked for years, since my first time as a delegate in 1997, about making some attendance available via remote sites or Internet. Maybe this will be the year we make good on it. Such changes would allow full participation of the international church, many of whom are not able to attend either because of cost or inability to obtain visas.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s